Trust in science among Americans has declined, a trend that has arisen from the way information is presented to the public. The recent pandemic is an example of conflicting and confusing information that eroded trust. Understanding and acknowledging that there is a lack of faith is the first step in rebuilding it, so here are 20 reasons why Americans no longer have confidence in science.
Political Polarization
Political ideologies affect attitudes toward science, especially on issues like climate change and public health measures. Research shows that conservative skepticism has increased as these subjects have become entangled with political identities, driving a wedge between scientific acceptance and ideological beliefs. Religious beliefs are also influential in whether someone believes in evolution or not.
Misinformation Spread
Social media has given everyone a voice, but that isn’t always beneficial to wider society. On platforms like Facebook and Twitter, unverified claims gain traction fast, muddling public understanding of scientific facts and creating doubt about scientific consensus. There’s also individuals masquerading as scientists and doctors, spreading misinformation that is believed by their followers to be scientifically verifiable when it’s not.
Corporate Influence
Public trust erodes when science appears to be in the pocket of corporate interests. Examples include fossil fuel companies funding climate change research or pharmaceutical giants sponsoring drug studies. This understandably leads to skepticism from the public, as large corporations exist to make money and don’t want findings that get in the way of that goal.
Media Sensationalism
News outlets create sensational or controversial headlines from scientific studies to attract attention and make a profit. This misleads the public about the nature of the findings and later leads to disillusionment if the sensationalized claims are retracted or debunked.
Complexity of Science
Scientific subjects are complex and hard for someone with no scientific background to comprehend. This complexity makes it easy for the average person to either misinterpret the information or turn away from engaging with it altogether. Science is always evolving, and findings change, but that doesn’t mean that everything before the new findings is false.
Lack of Education
A background in science education helps individuals critically evaluate scientific claims. Unfortunately, most of us have little more than a high school diploma when it comes to the three main sciences. Without this background, people don’t have enough understanding of the scientific contributions to everyday life to appreciate them, especially as many are not highlighted.
Decline in Institutional Trust
Distrust in major institutions, including the government, media, and educational systems, extends to scientific institutions. When these bodies are believed to be corrupt or biased, associated scientific claims may be viewed with suspicion. Science is also associated with the government, especially when it comes to healthcare.
Historical Misuses of Science
Historical exploitation in the name of science, such as unethical human experiments, continues to affect certain communities' trust in science and medicine. These past abuses make people understandably skeptical. There’s also been times when science has been wrong, as seen in the cases of the thalidomide babies.
Conflicting Information
The changing nature of scientific advice, especially visible during public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, confuses the public. When people receive conflicting guidance, their trust in the reliability of scientific advice will disappear. The general public is left unaware as to why guidance has changed and is told to just go along with it. Governments need to treat people less like children and provide more clarity.
Cultural Beliefs
Cultural or religious beliefs often conflict with scientific findings, leading people to ignore science in favor of cultural influences. Home remedies for illnesses are an example of cultural beliefs that have little scientific basis but many people rely on.
Perceived Elitism
Scientists are seen as elitist or disconnected from “ordinary” people, which creates distrust and a belief that science has a hidden agenda. When the public feels that scientists do not share their values or understand their lives, they will reject scientific conclusions and look to less reliable sources for answers.
Echo Chambers
Social media and personalized news feeds create echo chambers where individuals are fed viewpoints they already agree with. This reinforcement makes it difficult for scientific facts to find their way to non-believers. You only have to search once for information on social media, and you’ll be flooded with similar content, and there’ll be little variation.
Lack of Direct Benefits
If individuals do not feel or see the direct benefits of scientific research, they will question its value. This skepticism can be heightened when scientific advancements seem to serve industries or an elite rather than what is thought to be the common good.
Fear of Control
Advancements in technology and science cause fears about increased monitoring or control over personal lives. Concerns about privacy, particularly with technologies like genetic testing and AI surveillance, gives rise to conspiracy theories in relation to scientific developments.
Personal Beliefs
Personal experiences or anecdotal evidence leads individuals to conclusions that contradict scientific consensus. The belief in alternative medicine over conventional treatments is an example of this conflict and shows the need to teach cause and correlation.
Scandals and Fraud
When scientists are caught falsifying data or committing fraud, it casts a shadow of doubt over the scientific community. High-profile cases can lead to public skepticism about the integrity of scientific research. Although this is not a regular occurrence, it only takes one example for entire fields of research to be discredited.
Overconfidence in Individual Knowledge
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias wherein individuals overestimate their own knowledge or ability. When it comes to complex scientific issues, this bias can lead people to dismiss expert consensus in favor of their own uninformed opinions.
Reliance on Anecdotal Evidence
Humans are more influenced by personal stories than by abstract data. This leads people to disregard statistical evidence in favor of anecdotal experiences, which may not accurately represent reality. Many of these anecdotal experiences find their way into public discourse and become further exaggerated to try and prove a point.
Peer Influence
People are influenced by their social groups, and if skepticism or distrust of science is prevalent within a community, it's likely to spread among its members. Peer pressure causes people to be scared to go against the beliefs of their friends through fear of being an outcast. It might even be the case that they don’t truly believe in the ideas of their friend groups.
Lack of Transparency
When scientific processes and methodologies are not transparent, it can raise doubts about the validity of the research. Transparency with the public is needed if trust is to be rebuilt and people are able to feel that scientific research is in their interests.
30 Traditional Sayings That Are Now Considered Offensive by Woke Culture
30 Traditional Sayings That Are Now Considered Offensive by Woke Culture
21 Habits Often Associated With Having a Lower Social Status
21 Habits Often Associated With Having a Lower Social Status
25 Social Issues Gen Z are Determined to Cancel
