Brands must take an active stance against social issues that affect their customers and reflect them. This means taking stands on social issues that align with customer values. However, this strategy may backfire, causing companies to face backlash or boycotts that may lead to losing part or all of their customer base. We'll take a closer look at 18 brands that lost their edge after becoming too political or activist. This is how, even with good intentions, their actions led to unexpected consequences.
Dick's Sporting Goods
In taking an assertive stance on gun control, Dick's Sporting Goods made headlines for stopping sales of assault rifles and raising their minimum purchasing age. While some applauded this action, it caused an uproar among gun rights supporters. The sales suffered significantly due to customer boycotting of its stores. While their decision stood firm, this controversy demonstrated the risks businesses must consider when taking stands on divisive issues
Gillette
The razor company's controversial launch of “The Best Men Can Be” campaign to address toxic masculinity resulted in many traditional customers abandoning them and switching brands altogether. Instead of helping strengthen Gillette's brand image and increase sales, these customers felt the company's ads lectured them rather than providing quality shaving products.
Nike
Nike's partnership with Colin Kaepernick was intended to advance social justice. Instead, however, it led to controversy and debate within their market. Boycotts followed with some customers burning their Nike gear in protest. While this move gained them some new fans, it alienated a vital segment and caused many consumers to view Nike more as a political statement than a sportswear company.
Starbucks
Starbucks' push for social activism was met with a mixed reception. Initiatives like ‘Race Together', in which baristas encouraged customers to discuss race with one another, were criticized as out-of-touch with customer needs. Some simply wanted their coffee without added social commentary, and sales in some regions began declining.
Target
The retailer was met with strong opposition after it announced a bathroom policy allowing transgender individuals to use facilities of their choosing. Although intended for inclusivity, the policy was instead met with widespread outrage among customers who felt it was too political. This led to decreased foot traffic at Target stores as some shoppers switched to competitors who avoided taking such public stances, undermining Target's sales and reputation in certain regions.
Pepsi
Pepsi's advertisement featuring Kendall Jenner trying to address social justice issues through soda was widely panned, sparking strong outrage from many who felt it trivialized serious movements such as Black Lives Matter and trans rights activism. Sales immediately declined as customers expressed their displeasure with Pepsi. Although its commercial was quickly pulled, its negative repercussions remain as customers demonstrated their dislike with its attempts at social commentary.
The NFL
The NFL’s response to player protests during the national anthem sparked a nationwide debate. The league's attempt to balance support for players' rights with patriotism alienated many fans. Attendance and viewership dropped as fans chose sides. Some felt the NFL was too political, while others thought it wasn’t supportive enough. This divisiveness affected the league’s brand, showing difficulty navigating social issues without losing customer loyalty.
Coca-Cola
The soft drink giant's “diversity training” initiative, which included controversial guidelines, drew criticism. Employees were encouraged to be “less white,” sparking a backlash. Many viewed it as divisive and inappropriate. The resulting negative publicity affected the brand's image. Some customers chose to boycott Coca-Cola products, leading to a decline in sales. The episode underscored the fine line companies must walk when addressing sensitive cultural issues.
Disney
Disney's efforts to integrate more progressive themes into its movies and shows were met with a mixed reception from viewers and longtime fans. Though intended to promote diversity and inclusion, many longtime followers feel forced into these changes, which caused division among audiences. Ticket sales for some movies did not match expectations as Disney attempted to strike a balance between modern sensibilities while maintaining traditional storytelling techniques, an ongoing challenge that Disney must navigate successfully.
Kellogg’s
After featuring same-sex couples in its advertising campaigns, Kellogg's caused considerable debate and division within their customer base. While its intention may have been to promote inclusiveness, critics felt Kellogg was pushing an agenda. Sales suffered due to some customers' boycotts of Kellogg products, showing there can be risks when brands take a stand on social issues that not all customers accept well.
Adidas
Adidas' engagement in social issues such as sustainability and equality has proven rewarding and divisive at the same time. While some praised Adidas for being dedicated to these important causes, others felt a too-close association with activism overshadowed consumer preferences. This led some consumers away from Adidas to favor competitors with less vocal approaches on this matter. Eventually, the company experienced huge sales fluctuations.
Nordstrom
Nordstorm dropping Ivanka Trump's fashion line was seen by many as a political move. The brand claimed it was due to poor sales, but critics believed political pressures influenced it. This alienated a portion of their customer base as some loyal shoppers felt the store was taking sides. This led to boycotts and the controversy affected Nordstrom’s sales and reputation.
Lululemon
Public support for various social movements has been polarizing for Lululemon. While some customers appreciate the brand’s stance on issues like gender equality and racial justice, others feel it's too much. The company's activism turned off a segment of its market. Sales fluctuations have been noted as some customers seek out brands that focus solely on product quality rather than social commentary, showing the potential downsides of overt corporate activism.
Ben & Jerry's
Ben & Jerry's, known for its activism, took a stand against climate change and police reform that have caused division among its customers. While some appreciated its commitment, others felt Ben & Jerry's should focus solely on producing ice cream. As a result, sales decreased in regions where consumers prefer products over politics.
Levi’s
Levi's support of gun control measures caused considerable debate. They took an unpopular public stance promoting stricter gun laws that alienated some customers. Gun rights supporters felt targeted and chose to boycott Levi's products in protest. Sales suffered because its political stance overshadowed its reputation for quality denim.
Goya Foods
Goya Foods faced a significant backlash after its CEO expressed support for a controversial political figure. The brand’s public stance led to calls for boycotts. While some customers increased their purchases in support, others stopped buying Goya products altogether. The division among its customer base impacted sales. This incident highlighted the risks brands face when their leaders publicly align with polarizing political figures.
Victoria's Secret
While grappling with its image, Victoria's Secret attempted to transition away from traditional marketing approaches towards more inclusive tactics. Unfortunately, some customers saw their attempts at body positivity and diversity as too late and alienated longtime clients. Sales have since decreased as Victoria's Secret searches for its identity and strive to modernize without alienating existing customer bases, an extremely delicate balance.
Unilever
Unilever, the parent company of brands like Dove and Ben & Jerry’s, faced backlash for its strong stance on social issues. Campaigns addressing body positivity and environmental concerns have been polarizing. While some consumers appreciated the messages, others felt the company was too focused on activism. This led to boycotts and fluctuating sales. Unilever's challenge remains balancing its commitment to social issues with maintaining a broad customer base.
30 Traditional Sayings That Are Now Considered Offensive by Woke Culture
30 Traditional Sayings That Are Now Considered Offensive by Woke Culture
21 Habits Often Associated With Having a Lower Social Status
21 Habits Often Associated With Having a Lower Social Status
25 Social Issues Gen Z are Determined to Cancel
